Data tracking · Consent Mode v2
Consent that holds up, and data that survives it.
UK GDPR and PECR say ask first. Google says use Consent Mode v2 or lose Ads measurement. Both are satisfied by doing it properly once: a banner that means what it says, tags that obey it, and a record of who agreed to what.
Four things, in this order.
The audit
What we usually find in the first hour.
A banner is not compliance. These are the three ways it usually goes wrong.
Banner theatre
- —Cookies set before anyone clicks
- —Reject hidden behind Settings
- —Banner installed, tags unchanged
Over-blocking
- —Essential scripts blocked and the site breaks
- —Consent Mode never configured
- —Ads conversions vanish overnight
No paper trail
- —No consent log at all
- —Privacy policy lists cookies that do not exist
- —Nothing to show for a subject access request
Three weeks, then a routine.
Part of data tracking, which is inside every maintenance retainer. As standalone work it is quoted after the audit.
Keep reading
Common questions
Which banner tool do you use?+
A lightweight one we maintain for most sites; CookieYes or Cookiebot if you already pay for them. The tool matters less than whether the tags obey it.
Will we lose data?+
Some. Anyone who refuses is not tracked, which is the point. Advanced Consent Mode lets Google model the gap so the shape of the numbers stays honest.
Is this legal advice?+
No. It is implementation, done to ICO guidance and Google requirements. If your lawyer has a position, we build to it.
We have customers in the US and Canada too.+
The same setup respects Global Privacy Control signals and shows region-specific banners where CCPA or Quebec Law 25 apply. See privacy compliance for the legal side.